W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2004

Re: [CSS21] response to issue 115 (and 44)

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 22:38:27 +0100
Message-ID: <1127341742.20040218223827@w3.org>
To: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, Tex Texin <tex@i18nguy.com>, www-style@w3.org

On Wednesday, February 18, 2004, 2:29:36 PM, Bert wrote:


BB> Boris Zbarsky writes:
>> 
>> Bert Bos wrote:
>> >     [This is a response to the response to issue 44 as well.]
>> >     The new text reads:
>> 
>> Great!  I have one tiny little nit...
>> 
>> >       5. charset of referring document (if any)
>> 
>> The referring thing could also be a stylesheet, of course (@import 
>> rules), in which case I would think this should be the charset of that
>> stylesheet.

BB> Accepted. Added "...referring _stylesheet or_ document..."

So, one stylesheet referred to from two different documents with
different encodings, might get processed two different ways?

Is there really any need to add a fifth, potentially incompatible, way
to say the same thing to the four ways that already exist?

BB> (Now please implement it, because we're not sure that many browsers
BB> actually work like that, currently. And if we don't find two that do,
BB> we'll have to take it out again before making CSS 2.1 a Recommendation
BB> :-) )



BB> Bert




-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
 Member, W3C Technical Architecture Group
Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2004 16:38:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:26 GMT