- From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:38:59 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-style@w3.org
The XSL FO SG's understanding is that an important goal for W3C style-related specifications is to maintain consistency across the various models. The XSL FO SG developed the XSL simple page master model based on the recommendations of the CSS WG at the time, and we expected that the CSS model would be consistent with this. Therefore, the XSL FO SG does not accept this disposition of our Last Call comment on CSS3 Paged Media Module. Paul Grosso for the XSL FO SubGroup of the XSL WG At 01:02 2004 02 14 -0500, BIGELOW,JIM (HP-Boise,ex1) wrote: >Paul, > >Thank you for your comment of the CSS3 Paged Media Module. I agree that the >finer-grained page margin box model in this specification appears to differ >from the model referenced in you comment. There are no changes planned at >this to address this issue. If you have further comment on this topic, you >have seven days to reply, until February 20, 2004. > >You comment (#37): >> >> Regarding: CSS3 Paged Media Module >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-css3-page-20031218 >> >> The XSL FO SG <w3c-xsl-fo-sg@w3.org> notes that the model >> described in this draft differs from that in the XSL spec [1]. >> >> Specifically, the areas that correspond to XSL's >> region-before, etc., appear to fall outside the page margins >> whereas in XSL, they lie within the page margins. >> >> We have not had a chance to evaluate this more closely, so we >> have no more details at this time, but we wanted to get this >> comment in before it gets any later. >> >> Paul Grosso >> for the XSL FO SubGroup of the XSL WG >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/slice6.html#fo_simple-page-master >> > > -- Jim Bigelow, editor
Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2004 08:11:59 UTC