W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2004

Re: [CSS21] response to issue 15b

From: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:23:57 -0800
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BC5690FE.367D8%tantek@cs.stanford.edu>

On 2/16/04 2:25 PM, "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote:

> 
> * Tantek Çelik wrote:
>>>>> I assume you mean by considering it closed that the Working Group will
>>>>> report my objection to the Director in their request for advancement.
>>>> 
>>>> By considering it closed we mean that the points raised in your previous
>>>> emails in this thread have been responded to.
>>> 
>>> Ok.
>>> 
>>>> Please quote and cite with URL predating the CSS 2.1 LC deadline what you
>>>> consider your objection to be, because otherwise, the group believes all
>>>> your objections have been responded to and properly explained.
>>> 
>>> I am just pointing out that your response does not remove my objection.
>> 
>> I am just pointing out that by failing to provide a quote and cite with URL
>> predating the CSS 2.1 LC deadline with what you consider your objection to
>> be, you have removed your objection.
> 
> I may register formal objection at *any time*

The working group has no obligation to report even the existence of
responses/objections made after the last call review deadline.

> and I obviously cannot
> register formal objection prior to the review deadline if I object to a
> response of the Working Group that is sent past this deadline, hence I
> do not understand how the Last Call Review Deadline is relevant here.

It is relevant in that the only objections the working group must respond to
are those made before the last call deadline.  New objections, even if they
are made in the middle of some other thread, do not require a response.

> I
> neither understand why I need to point you at my formal objection

Because again, you failed to quote it as requested.  You simply provided two
URLs to messages which have already been responded to.

>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2004Feb/0102.html

Response:

 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2004Feb/0103.html

> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2004Feb/0107.html

Response:

 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2004Feb/0307.html


> I sent it to the list in response to what I object to, that should be
> absolutely sufficient.

And the working group replied and explained away your objections, which is
sufficient.

If you don't think so, it is your burden to provide the specific objection
quote and URL.

Thanks,

Tantek
Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 18:24:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:26 GMT