W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2004

[CSS21] response to issue 150

From: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:39:54 +0100
Message-Id: <200402131739.i1DHdsDk030612@lanalana.inria.fr>
To: fantasai <fantasai@escape.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org

This is the CSS WG's response to an issue you raised on the last CSS
2.1 draft (http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-CSS21-20030915). We want to
publish CSS 2.1 as a CR in about two weeks. Please let us know this
week if you think our response is wrong.

Your e-mail:
    http://www.w3.org/mid/3F9408C5.2040507@escape.com

    # Note: The specificity is based only on the form of the selector.
    # In particular, a selector of the form "[id=p33]" is counted as an
    # attribute selector (a=0, b=0, c=1, d=0), even if the id attribute
    # is defined as an "ID" in the source document's DTD.

    This text should be normative, not informative, and therefore
    should not be marked as a note. Also, move it up to before "Some
    examples", right after "Contcatenating the four numbers a-b-c-d
    (in a number system with a large base) gives the specificity".

CSS WG response:
    editorial, editor to deal with this
*Bert* Further communication is required.
*howcome* Document to be updated.

---
For the CSS WG,
Bert
Received on Friday, 13 February 2004 13:30:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:26 GMT