W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2004

[CSS21] response to issue 74

From: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 23:04:17 +0100
Message-ID: <16425.21857.420099.432694@lanalana.inria.fr>
To: fantasai <fantasai@escape.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org

This is the CSS WG's response to an issue you raised on the last CSS
2.1 draft (http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-CSS21-20030915). We want to
publish CSS 2.1 as a CR in about two weeks. Please let us know this
week if you think our response is wrong.

Your e-mail:
    http://www.w3.org/mid/3F81EB3F.5020400@escape.com

    S4.3.6 <http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-CSS21-20030915/syndata.html#color-units>:
    # The format of an RGB value in the functional notation is 'rgb('
    # followed by a comma-separated list of three numerical values (either
    # three integer values or three percentage values) followed by ')'.

    Is rgb(255, 0, 50%) invalid, then?

CSS WG response:
    Yes. (Was already like that in CSS1.)



For the CSS WG,
Bert
-- 
  Bert Bos                                ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/
  http://www.w3.org/people/bos/                              W3C/ERCIM
  bert@w3.org                             2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
  +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92            06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2004 17:05:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:26 GMT