W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2004

Re: [css3-speech] Proposal: an aural box model

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 15:44:42 +0200
Message-ID: <411239CA.6050504@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org

csant wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 11:41:01 +0200, fantasai  
> <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> 
>> So, imho, the box model for aural css should be
>>
>>    pause-before
>>    cue-before
>>    cue-padding-before
>>    content
>>    cue-padding-after
>>    cue-after
>>    pause-after
>>
>> where cue-padding pads the cue so it doesn't run up against the edge 
>> of  the content (the same way padding in visual CSS pads the border so
 >> it doesn't run up against the content).
> 
> Yes, this was my original thought - but I do not particularly like  
> 'cue-padding-before' and 'cue-padding-after': it is not clear that  
> 'cue-padding-before' actually is the padding after the cue-before... :)

How about 'cue-before-padding' and 'cue-after-padding'?

> I would propose to stick to the convention of labeling this model an
 > 'aural box model'.

Yeah, I agree with that. :)

~fantasai

-- 
http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/contact
Received on Thursday, 5 August 2004 09:50:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:32 GMT