- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 15:44:42 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
csant wrote: > > On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 11:41:01 +0200, fantasai > <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > >> So, imho, the box model for aural css should be >> >> pause-before >> cue-before >> cue-padding-before >> content >> cue-padding-after >> cue-after >> pause-after >> >> where cue-padding pads the cue so it doesn't run up against the edge >> of the content (the same way padding in visual CSS pads the border so >> it doesn't run up against the content). > > Yes, this was my original thought - but I do not particularly like > 'cue-padding-before' and 'cue-padding-after': it is not clear that > 'cue-padding-before' actually is the padding after the cue-before... :) How about 'cue-before-padding' and 'cue-after-padding'? > I would propose to stick to the convention of labeling this model an > 'aural box model'. Yeah, I agree with that. :) ~fantasai -- http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/contact
Received on Thursday, 5 August 2004 09:50:32 UTC