W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2003

Re: [CSS21] Exit Criteria vs. Process Requirements

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 08:52:03 +0000 (UTC)
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0309220850320.13218@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>
> I think the Candiate Recommendation Exit Criteria listed in the
> CSS 2.1 Last Call Working Draft "violate" the W3C Process Document.
>
> It states that features may get dropped under certain circumstances but
> it does not identify which features are considered at risk. The Process
> Document requires to identify such features, otherwise the document
> would be put back to the Working Group for further work if features are
> dropped. This probably not intended by the statement.

Going back to Last Call with an updated document is actually what I would
prefer. Any feature we remove is likely to cause big changes to the
document and we really should have a solid revew period for that.

-- 
Ian Hickson                                      )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
U+1047E                                         /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
http://index.hixie.ch/                         `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 22 September 2003 04:52:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:23 GMT