W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2003

Re: One more list-item thought

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 14:50:53 +0000 (UTC)
To: "staffan.mahlen@comhem.se" <staffan.mahlen@comhem.se>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0309141447530.19231@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, staffan.mahlen@comhem.se wrote:
>
> however neither IE6, Ns7.1, nor Opera7.11 does it seems. They even
> have two different approaches, neither of which seem correct (I
> didn't test the latest Mozilla).

Browsers differ from each other, from common sense, and from the specs by
significant enough amounts that I haven't really been paying too much
attention to them. :-)


> To my mind this case should be equivalent in both the new and the old
> model, but it seem to be troublesome in the old one. Does the new model
> makes this easier or is this just a case of browser bugs?

Given that we've discussed more than 2 models in this thread, that there
are at least two interpretations of the CSS2 model, and that CSS2.1 and
the current CSS3 draft have yet more models, I'm not sure how to answer
that. :-) Obviously, CSS3 is trying to be the best model.


> Hmm, care to elaborate on that bit about "superior parent"? I did not
> quite get it.

See the CSS3 Generated and Replaced Content model, which is part of the
same model:

   http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-content/

-- 
Ian Hickson                                      )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
U+1047E                                         /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
http://index.hixie.ch/                         `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Sunday, 14 September 2003 10:51:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:23 GMT