W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2003

Re: [CSS3] Generated and Replaced Content - Grouping (long, examples)

From: Afternoon <afternoon@uk2.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 00:22:05 +0000
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-Id: <41978585-0B38-11D8-883F-000A957E8988@uk2.net>


On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 12:12 AM, Afternoon wrote:

> With a grouping function, if some expected markup went missing, it 
> could at least know to end a set if it wanted to start a new one, 
> would this be possible with bookmarks?

Scratch that, of course it would.

I'm struggling to find anything which makes the two solutions 
functionally different. Syntactically, I think that my solution would 
be easier for authors to write and understand and, because it's more 
declarative and bookmarks are almost procedural, is more in keeping 
with the style of CSS.

Then again you undoubtedly know much more about the style of CSS than 
me.

Ben


(q)	Ben Godfrey?
(a)	Web Developer and Designer
	See http://aftnn.org/ for details
Received on Thursday, 30 October 2003 19:23:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:24 GMT