W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2003

RE: CSS 4?

From: Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 05:55:33 -0800
Message-Id: <200310261356.h9QDu8b24103@server1.livestoryboard.com>
To: "'Bjoern Hoehrmann'" <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: <www-style@w3.org>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net]
> Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 5:43 AM
> To: Robert Koberg
> Cc: www-style@w3.org
> 
> * Robert Koberg wrote:
> >> On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Robert Koberg wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I see that you (Tantek) are not necessarily dissing XSL, but I wanted
> to
> >> > point out that XSL is not useless.
> >>
> >> Please don't confuse XSL with XSLT.
> >
> >The acronym 'XSL' is generally used to describe both.
> 
> No, it is generally used to describe either Formatting Objects or
> Transformations, that's why the term is not generally used, you
> rather refer to XSLT or XSL-FO to avoid confusion.

Well, I understood Ian to be referring to XSL *as* XSL-FO, which is why I
mentioned (or attempted) that XSL is an inclusive thing, not one or the
other. However, what you wrote is more clear.

Best,
-Rob
Received on Sunday, 26 October 2003 08:55:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:24 GMT