W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2003

Re: CSS 4?

From: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 07:51:44 -0700
To: David Latapie <julian27@ifrance.com>
Cc: <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BBBD38BF.2EEF3%tantek@cs.stanford.edu>

On 10/22/03 10:37 AM, "David Latapie" <julian27@ifrance.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday 22 October 2003, at 17:45PM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
>> On 10/22/03 2:06 AM, "David Latapie" <julian27@ifrance.com> wrote:
>> Which do you think is more successful in the market?
> Isn't W3C pushing for XSL?

W3C is pushing for many standards, some of which overlap in terms of their
uses and applications.  Some overlap is actually a good thing as it allows
the market to pick the a better winner than the politbüro could have.

>> Which do you think is easier to author?
> Never used XSL, but people around said XSL is awful

Try it yourself to appreciate it and form your own opinion.

>> Which is showing active development (new specs, features being
>> published)?
> I trust you on that, I thought XLS was active

I'm not sure much is being done on the Excel spreadsheet format (certainly
not at W3C), but presumably that was a typo.

One fairly unscientific analysis is provided by:


>> Which is more actively discussed on mailing lists?
> Alright, I got my anwser :-)
> Thank you. Now that I5/Mac is gone,

Sad but true.  Everything that has a beginning has an end.

> what are you doing

We do only what we are meant to do.

> (out of possible 
> minor releases)? Safari?

The Safari team and project are in good hands.

Received on Thursday, 23 October 2003 10:48:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:09 UTC