I'm sorry, a crucial "not" was left out of my original message; that is: > If the standard at least suggested what entailed > maintenance of style and what entailed ditching it, it > would send UAs down a somewhat consistent path, but > *NOT* constrain any UA to that pattern alone in case > they came up with something better I understand that placing things in the spec can stifle implementers. Therefore I agree the mechanism should not be part of the W3C spec; but having a suggestion that UAs could follow in case they're not otherwise inspired would at least give most implementers a common starting point. -Chris "SoopahMan" Moschini http://hiveminds.info/ http://soopahman.com/Received on Monday, 6 October 2003 09:39:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:24 GMT