> The point, however, isn't the proposal itself, but that I don't think > this would have the accessibility problems you mention. yes, i agree. this would make sense and do exactly what CSS was meant for: seperating style and content. i know this example of yours was just a rough shot, and i consider my worries removed, at last the HTML part of it won't change a lot, and now i wonder how this would affect links given in the document, but not referenced in the stylesheet. i mean: as i understood, the image should be added to the div's content (where? at the top? the bottom?) and every link having an image-map-region property will be replaced by clickable regions inside the image. what about those links which don't have this? will they be simple text links below/above the imagemap? hm. while asking those questions i guess this would make sense. one simply had to settle on how to do this exactly. --DanielReceived on Thursday, 5 June 2003 08:38:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:21 GMT