W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2003

Re: Nominate definition of "presentation"?

From: Shelby Moore <shelby@coolpage.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 17:24:50 -0600
Message-Id: <4.1.20030105171941.03cbd440(null)>
To: "J. David Eisenberg" <catcode@catcode.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org

At 01:32 PM 1/5/2003 -0600, J. David Eisenberg wrote:
>> Can every one agree this is one useful way of defining "presentation"??
>
>Sorry, but I must be exceptionally ignorant (or worse, stupid)--I don't
>understand this definition at all.


No need to say that.  Questions from people who want to learn are the best
questions to ask.

I expected the definition would need some examples, because it is a very
abstract and powerful one.


>  A succinct, concrete example would
>help me get it through my thick, concrete skull.


I just gave 3 examples.  2 show what is "presentation" and 1 shows
"non-conforming semantic implementation":


http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Jan/0124.html

See "p:empty":
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Jan/0123.html


-Shelby Moore
Received on Sunday, 5 January 2003 18:23:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:19 GMT