Boris Zbarsky wrote: > Pretty much exactly this method has been suggested before, on numerous > occasions. The first few times, the WG members pointed out the flaws in > the method (eg issues with interaction with other rules, with user > sheets, etc, etc). Then the next few times they pointed to the earlier > discussions. O.k. Excuse my ignorance. Would you point me to an earlier discussion which suggests pretty much the same exact method? I would like to find out what are the flaws in the interaction with user sheets - this compared to the current state of interaction with user sheets. > I'm guessing at this point they're just too fed up with people not > searching the archives to even bother responding. ;) Again, sorry for bringing this issue once more, to any bored WG members. -- StanimirReceived on Tuesday, 30 December 2003 13:04:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 11 September 2008 23:28:25 GMT