W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2002

Re: CSS, css, etc. [css layout should be symmetrical]

From: Daniel Glazman <glazman@netscape.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 18:04:47 +0100
Message-ID: <3C73D72F.8020602@netscape.com>
To: Vadim Plessky <lucy-ples@mtu-net.ru>
CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, www-style@w3.org
Vadim Plessky wrote:

>There is a CSS3, and there is no reason to implement *old* stuff when you can 
>go directly to a newer one.
>
Where ? Can you show us a REC ? Or at least a CR version of the Tables 
CSS 3 module ?

>Theoretically, that's right.
>But I did some research in that direction - and it shows that neither Mozilla 
>nor MS IE can render CSS2 'table-*' properties. Konqueror handles it much 
>better but still fails on some tetss.
>Well, to be fare: MS never said that they support CSS2.
>Can you explain Mozilla's position on this, please?
>
I can explain.
And I can explain very easily : your test is just wrong. I have in front 
of me right now a table made with DIVs with the 'display' values needed 
for table, row and cell.
Btw, there is only one "table-*" property and a little bit more 
"table-*" display values.

>Well, than we face more fundamental question: wether HTML should be used?..
>
Ah, if we now reach religious matters and studies about the existence of 
parallel worlds, I am off to bed.

</Daniel>

-- 
Daniel Glazman                                    Composer & CSS Engine
Netscape Communications Corp.                      glazman@netscape.com
http://people.netscape.com/glazman            AIM:glazou2000 IRC:glazou
The main thing is to keep the main thing the main thing - Jim Barksdale
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2002 12:04:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:13 GMT