- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2002 18:17:45 +0100
- To: Andrew Clover <and@doxdesk.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Andrew Clover wrote: > > I have serious reservations about this spec as it stands (mainly: sections > 5.2 - 5.4, which don't belong in a styling language IMO), and I'd like > to know if there have been any shift in thinking since then. As the editor of the "Advanced UI" spec (aka "UI2"), I am curious as to where you believe such properties actually belong. The Mozilla team has found that CSS is in fact an ideal place for such properties. Could you explain what alternative ideas you have? Cheers, -- Ian Hickson ``The inability of a user agent to implement part of this specification due to the limitations of a particular device (e.g., non interactive user agents will probably not implement dynamic pseudo-classes because they make no sense without interactivity) does not imply non-conformance.'' -- Selectors, Sec13
Received on Saturday, 6 April 2002 12:17:50 UTC