At 06:27 PM 10/10/00 +0200, Daniel Glazman wrote: >Matthew Brealey wrote: > >> Precisely one argument - one simple selector. Cause !:first-child is >> not as nicely wrapped up as :!(:first-child). I did consider :not(), >> but I preferred the briefer syntax. > >Sorry, but I do not support (I mean not *at all*) this courageous >attempt to add smileys :!( to W3C selectors. Oh, come on, Daniel! It might be nice to have something cheery in a W3C spec for once. After all these years of poring over dry text, a smile finally emerges... Okay, I'm kidding too. Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. XHTML: Migrating Toward XML http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and booksReceived on Tuesday, 10 October 2000 12:55:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:06 GMT