Matthew Brealey wrote: > Precisely one argument - one simple selector. Cause !:first-child is > not as nicely wrapped up as :!(:first-child). I did consider :not(), > but I preferred the briefer syntax. Sorry, but I do not support (I mean not *at all*) this courageous attempt to add smileys :!( to W3C selectors. </Daniel> _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.comReceived on Tuesday, 10 October 2000 12:27:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:06 GMT