- From: Ian Hickson <py8ieh@bath.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2000 18:41:53 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Matthew Brealey <thelawnet@yahoo.com>
- cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Matthew Brealey wrote:
> Invisible rows:
>
> Given that visibility is inherited and therefore that TR {visibility:
> hidden} will hide its descendant table cells, why does the spec cite
> visibility: collapse as useful in the context of table rows?
My reading of this is that 'collapse' will actually have the same effect
as 'display:none', whereas 'hidden' will leave a blank area where the row
would have been.
--
Ian Hickson ("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._
http://www.bath.ac.uk/%7Epy8ieh/ `6_ 6 ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`)
(_Y_.)' ._ ) `._ `. ``-..-' fL
Member, Mozilla Quality Assurance _..`--'_..-_/ /--'_.' ,'
Browser Standards Compliance Team (il).-'' (li).' ((!.-'
Received on Saturday, 18 March 2000 13:41:58 UTC