On Fri, 28 Jan 2000, Matthew Brealey wrote: >> Nothing normative, at any rate. You can treat BR as an empty inline >> element with this style: >> >> BR:before { >> content: '\A'; >> white-space: pre; >> } > It could equally well be done as BR:after, thereby causing drastically > different results, which demonstrates why it isn't a good idea to > treat it in this manner at all. Why different results? Since there is no content (it is an empty element), the :before and :after pseudo-elements would have basically the same effect. -- Ian Hickson ("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._ http://www.bath.ac.uk/%7Epy8ieh/ `6_ 6 ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`) (_Y_.)' ._ ) `._ `. ``-..-' fL Member, Mozilla Quality Assurance _..`--'_..-_/ /--'_.' ,' Browser Standards Compliance Team (il).-'' (li).' ((!.-'Received on Monday, 31 January 2000 19:09:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:03 GMT