- From: Tim Bannister <isoma@compsoc.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 18:25:46 +0000 (GMT)
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Matthew Brealey wrote:
>Visibility:
>I would like to propose the following changes to visibility:
><blockquote>
>'visibility'
>Value:
>visible | hidden | collapse | inherit
>Initial:
>inherit
>[change to visible]
>Applies to:
>all elements
>Inherited:
>no
>[change to yes]
>Percentages:
>N/A
>Media:
>visual
>The 'visibility' property specifies whether the boxes generated by an
>element are rendered. [change to
>The 'visibility' property specifies whether the boxes generated by an
>element are transparent.]
>Invisible boxes still affect layout (set the 'display' property to 'none'
>to suppress box generation altogether).
>[change to
>Transparent boxes still affect layout (set the 'display' property to
>'none' to suppress box generation altogether).]
>
>Values have the following meanings:
>visible
>The generated box is visible.
>[change to 'The colours of the generated box are honoured.']
>hidden
>The generated box is invisible (fully transparent), but still affects
>layout.
>[change to 'The colours of the generated box are not honoured but instead
>are all transparent.']
></blockquote>
Does visibility make sense in an Aural style sheet (ie, would the
play-during sounds be audible during a pause equivalent to how long it
would take to play the element)?
--
Tim Bannister - isoma@compsoc.man.ac.uk
"Rumour has it that the intrepid New Zealanders have finally discovered
two new uses for sheep. Meat and wool." - fortune
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2000 13:25:49 UTC