- From: Beth Skwarecki <skwareea@screech.cs.alfred.edu>
- Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 15:07:54 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
> SSI would lose you some performance, for no good reason in this case. Imho > <link> is cleaner, better bandwidth-wise, and also has the advantage that > it won't interfere with the validity of your (x)html code. With an external > style sheet you don't have to escape < and friends. The time it takes to insert an include is negligible, though I grant you that it's existent. The difference between <link> and an include, bandwidth-wise, is just about zero. Actually, the include would save you one line. SSI doesn't require the escaping of any characters, and won't interfere with code validity at all. It's done with a tag that looks like a comment, and the included file should also be written in valid html. --beth
Received on Friday, 15 December 2000 15:08:06 UTC