Ian Hickson wrote: > > Angles are measured anti-clockwise from the positive x direction, > and rotations are based on the center of the box. So a 180 degree > rotation would have the same effect as mirroring and flipping the > box (position and size would be left unchanged). Might it not be simpler, implementation-wise, to assume rotation point to be the upper-left corner of the box, and to limit rotation to positioned elements outside the normal flow? Section 9.3.2 of the CSS2 spec states that "An element is said to be positioned if its 'position' property has a value other than 'static'. Positioned elements generate positioned boxes, laid out according to four properties..." Perhaps the simplest means for rotation would be to add a fifth property "angle" or "rotation", with the rotation point being the same point used for positioning. David PerrellReceived on Saturday, 3 July 1999 23:20:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:53:59 GMT