W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 1999

RE: New WD: CSS3 selectors

From: Garth Wallace <gwalla@sfgate.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 10:57:03 -0700
Message-ID: <7E36FB0187D9D211B6710060979380A2BF91BA@caen.sfchron.com>
To: www-style@w3.org
Why? That's like saying that Lisp should conform to C syntax.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	www-style-request@w3.org [SMTP:www-style-request@w3.org]
> Sent:	Wednesday, August 04, 1999 2:42 PM
> To:	www-style@w3.org
> Subject:	Re: New WD: CSS3 selectors
> 
> In article <14248.30734.450097.535320@www43.inria.fr>, Bert Bos
> <Bert.Bos@sophia.inria.fr> writes
> >A new working draft was just published:
> >
> >    CSS3 module: W3C selectors 
> >    http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-CSS3-selectors-19990803
> 
> The new draft uses a lot of blah-de-blah pseudo classes and suchlike.
> Today I also had a glance at the new SMIL draft, which specifically
> talks about replacing such things with a blahDeBlah kind of arrangement.
> Wouldn't it be better to be consistent across all the various
> technologies?
> 
> If that makes any sense at all.
> 
> -- 
> George Lund
Received on Thursday, 5 August 1999 14:02:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:00 GMT