In article <7E36FB0187D9D211B6710060979380A2BF91BA@caen.sfchron.com>, Garth Wallace <gwalla@sfgate.com> writes [rearranged according to usual custom] >> > CSS3 module: W3C selectors >> > http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-CSS3-selectors-19990803 >> >> The new draft uses a lot of blah-de-blah pseudo classes and suchlike. >> Today I also had a glance at the new SMIL draft, which specifically >> talks about replacing such things with a blahDeBlah kind of arrangement. >> Wouldn't it be better to be consistent across all the various >> technologies? >Why? That's like saying that Lisp should conform to C syntax. Well perhaps that should be taken as a comment on the changes to the SMIL syntax, rather than my plea for consistency. -- George LundReceived on Sunday, 8 August 1999 13:03:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:00 GMT