- From: Lawrance Family Member <lawranc5@airmail.net>
- Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 12:03:52 -0500
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
Whoah! I honestly didn't expect this many replies to my original message! :-D I like the idea of: gradient(<color>, <extent>, <color>, <extent>, <angle>) But, if were going this far, why don't we go even further? Here's what I mean: pattern(<type>, <color>, <extent>, <color>, <extent>, <angle>, ....) (I have the elipses to indicate that one may want to have more than two colors in a gradient, as in a rainbow, for example.) where <type> can be: gradient boxes bricks bubbles buttons cargo-net circles circuits cobblestones colosseum critters daisies diagonal-lines diamonds dizzy field-effect horizontal-lines houndstooth key leaves live-wire marble metal-links paisley pattern pinstripe plaid quilt rivets rounder scales scottie spinner stitches stone straw-mat tartan thatches tile triangles tulip vertical-lines waves waffle weave zigzag or an address for a bitmapped-texture to apply to the two (or more) colors. -Joey -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 http://www.geekcode.com GCS/SS/TW d+(++) s-: a17 C++++ U--- !P !L !E W+++ N+++ o+++ K? w+++++ O---- !M V PS+ PE+++ Y+++ PGP->+++ t++@ 5 X++++ R- tv++(+) b++(+++) DI+++ D@ G+ e- h!>--- r y>+++++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Received on Sunday, 10 May 1998 13:04:02 UTC