W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 1998

Re: pseudo-class suggestion

From: Carl Johan Berglund <carl.johan.berglund@adverb.se>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 15:46:46 +0100
Message-Id: <l03102805b12ef6f08a5d@[195.7.72.77]>
To: roconnor@uwaterloo.ca
Cc: www-style@w3.org
At 15.23 +0100 98-03-13, Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor wrote:
>It doesn't seem like a good idea to me.  The active and this fragment
>pseudo-class idea are more different than similar.  Consider the following
>case:
>
><A NAME=foo HREF=foo.html>Some Link</>
>
>Now the active pseudo-class can refer to this element in two completely
>different ways.  One for the fragment ID case, and one for the active link
>case.  The author is likely to want two different styles for the two
>different cases.

True. The idea wasn't as good as it seemed at a first glance.

Carl Johan Berglund


___Carl_Johan_Berglund_________________________
   Adverb Information
   carl.johan.berglund@adverb.se
   http://www.adverb.se/
Received on Friday, 13 March 1998 09:46:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:53:54 GMT