- From: Steve Knoblock <knoblock@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 1998 12:37:04 -0500
- To: "gordon" <gordon69b@earthlink.net>, <www-style@w3.org>
I've had to return to using tables for layout on many pages because of the slow implementation of style sheet enabled browsers. I need columns on my pages and without CSS positioning or EM values I must resort to those pixel width tables because they work and are stable. It's no longer tolerable for me to have my pages looking amateurish to most people (actually to advertisers). So I can understand. It just illustrates the depressing situation that we are in without the majority browser maker deploying a realistic CSS-enabled browser. Steve At 08:42 PM 1/12/98 +0000, gordon wrote: >Actually I'd expect nothing less from these sites. Aren't they the same ones >that hard-code for 640 pixel width, when percentages would allow display at >any resolution? I think it's more of a vote for the lowest common >denominator (on both counts). _/ Steve Knoblock mailto:editor@city-gallery.com _/ City Gallery http://www.city-gallery.com/ _/ Member NSA http://www.3d-web.com/nsa/nsa.htm
Received on Tuesday, 13 January 1998 12:37:46 UTC