W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 1997

Re: Quote markup

From: Todd Fahrner <fahrner@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 20:36:58 -0700
Message-Id: <v03102805af945507a5e1@[]>
To: David Siegel <dave@verso.com>, Peter Fraterdeus <peterf@mail.dol.com>
Cc: www-html@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
At 19:19 -0700 5.5.97, David Siegel wrote:

> I definitely would argue against a <Q> tag, because it's not metadata.

Sure it is. It says: "the enclosed bit is in another voice - render as
appropriate". It should replace <blockquote> now that CSS lets you say
whether an element should be rendered block or inline. Or is that the idea?
Get rid of <b> and <align>, as well?

In typesetting, the decision whether to render a quotation block or inline
usually has something to do with length - number of lines. Without knowing
how lines might break in a given instance, authors can't confidently tag a
quotation "block". Nor can they style the element appropriately without
scripting to work out the parameters.

Todd Fahrner

The printed page transcends space and time. The printed page, the
infinitude of books, must be transcended. THE ELECTRO-LIBRARY.

--El Lissitzky, 1923
Received on Monday, 5 May 1997 23:27:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:26:43 UTC