Chris Wilson writes: >I don't see exactly why this is beyond the realm of CSS (obviously beyond >CSS1, but not necessarily CSS2, e.g.). It's purely a declarative >mechanism, and pretty easy to drop into both the syntax and (in our case >at least) the implementation. another tuesday brain misfire chris. I said _CSS1_. :) And by the way - answer your phone. :) >Forcing DSSSL on content authors and Web tool implementers who are >resistant even to the simplicity of CSS is just probably not going to >work. Hence the throwing CSS through a converter. I meant this to mean internally Emacs-W3 would convert CSS declarations into a DSSSL equivalent. The user and the author wouldn't have to know the difference between DSSSL and a hole in the wall. -Bill P.Received on Tuesday, 4 February 1997 14:57:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:53:49 GMT