W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 1997

RE: IE bug list -Reply

From: Chris Wilson (PSD) <cwilso@MICROSOFT.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 13:27:47 -0800
Message-ID: <c=US%a=_%p=msft%l=RED-76-MSG-970203212747Z-72374@INET-02-IMC.microsoft.com>
To: "'Hakon Lie'" <howcome@w3.org>, "'Charles Peyton Taylor'" <CTaylor@wposmtp.nps.navy.mil>
Cc: "'marym@Finesse.COM'" <marym@Finesse.COM>, "'www-style@w3.org'" <www-style@w3.org>
Um, that was programm_ER_, H&kon.  :^)

Chris Wilson

>-----Original Message-----
>From:	Hakon Lie [SMTP:howcome@w3.org]
>Sent:	Monday, February 03, 1997 12:57 PM
>To:	Charles Peyton Taylor
>Cc:	marym@Finesse.COM; www-style@w3.org
>Subject:	IE bug list -Reply
>Charles Peyton Taylor writes:
> > There is one at W3C:
> > http://www.w3.org/pub/www/Style/css/msie/
> > I can think of several reasons for the link being removed: 
> > the list page is based on 3.0b1 (for Windows 95) when 3.01 is 
> > out with improvements (and MSIE 3.0 for Macintosh has a higher 
> > level of support) and perhaps it would be unfair to fully 
> > document only one browser's support when soon more than one 
> > major browser will have CSS support (of course, whether the 
> > W3C should, or even has the time to track compliance of CSS 
> > is another question.)
>Right. The link was removed since I no longer had time to track IE3.
>The MS programmers were faster..
>For W3C, interoperability is a major concern and tracking conformance
>is a part of that. Also, we hope to publish CSS1 test suites in the
>There is room for volunteer efforts in this area, both in updating
>feature/but pages and (a much bigger job) help compile test suites.
>H      k   o   n      W   i   u   m       L   i   e
>howcome@w3.org   W o r l d   Wide  W e b  Consortium
>inria # FRANCE http://www.w3.org/people/howcome
Received on Monday, 3 February 1997 16:26:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:26:42 UTC