Douglas Rand wrote: > Not the way it's been defined. That's the problem. They did this > nasty thing in the definition you posted - they placed the properties > *between* the UA and the author's stylesheet. I'm not convinced that > elements like FONT can even work with that definition. It looks to me > as if *any* font-family property will turn off FONT FACE, or font-size > turns off FONT SIZE, even if the properties are for a parent element, > e.g. BODY or HTML. Why would any font-family property turn off FONT FACE? A declared property takes precedence over an inherited one, even if the declaration is of lowest possible weight. As for precedence, I see what you mean. I think the spec should be changed. HTML attributes should be positioned lowest in the relative weight heirarchy. This means a user will be able to override an author's HTML ALIGN property in their stylesheet, but so what? All an author need do is duplicate the inline HTML attribute with a CSS property to insure precedence. David PerrellReceived on Monday, 4 August 1997 17:13:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:53:51 GMT