W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 1996

parent-child relationships

From: Hakon Lie <Hakon.Lie@sophia.inria.fr>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 1996 22:47:15 +0100
Message-Id: <199601152147.WAA01153@www4.inria.fr>
To: "Chris Wilson (PSD)" <cwilso@microsoft.com>
Cc: Glenn Adams <glenn@stonehand.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Chris Wilson writes:

 > if good reason is offered, immediate ancestry can be added to the CSS spec. 
 >  It doesn't seem like such a difficult addition, to either the spec or my 
 > implementation... anyone else?

yes, it can very easily be added, but we don't plan to do so for
CSS1. We have to keep the specification simple while handing out some
new toys. It's easy to attack this strategy: one can complain about
the specification being to complex, or that one cannot do this or
that. Some people now appear to take both these stands...



Hakon W Lie, W3C/INRIA, Sophia-Antipolis, France
http://www.w3.org/People/howcome  howcome@w3.org
Received on Monday, 15 January 1996 16:48:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:26:39 UTC