W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 1995

Re: fwd:Fonts

From: Joe English <joe@trystero.art.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 1995 09:26:14 PDT
Message-Id: <9507061626.AA05472@trystero.art.com>
To: www-style@www10.w3.org

hopmann@holonet.net (Alex Hopmann) wrote:
> > > A generic character-level text container tag in HTML 3.0 would be        
> > > extremely useful for applying styles to certain blocks of text. I propose
> > > the following tag:
> > > <TEXT>...</TEXT>
> >
> >This would be very useful indeed, and will talk to Dave Raggett about
> This seems similar in intent to the <C> tag that I propsed in my character
> formatting proposal (With the obvious addition of style sheet information).
> 
> Is that correct? What are the relative merrits of calling it <C> (character)
> vs. <TEXT>?


The name "FONT" should also be considered, since that's already
deployed as an experimental Netscape extension.  (There it's
only used to specify the font size, but other presentation-only
attributes could be added as well).  Personally, I prefer "TEXT"
over "FONT" or "C".

I agree that there is a need for such a tag.  Although in *most* 
cases one of the semantic elements like <EM>, <STRONG>, or <DFN> is
more appropriate, there are plenty of Web pages which apply formatting
for the sake of formatting, and there is currently no general-purpose
semantics-free phrase-level element which can be used for this purpose.


--Joe English

  joe@art.com
Received on Thursday, 6 July 1995 12:26:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:53:42 GMT