Re: Response to [SMIL30 CR comment] to-animation (12.6.4)

Sjoerd Mullender:

>
> Then I don't understand the question.
>
> As a further point, in SMIL Animation (which is what SVG 1.1 uses) there
> is also the sentence "a discrete to animation will simply set the "to"
> value for the simple duration" [1], so even in that version the
> semantics were already there.  Why these semantics are like this, I
> don't know.  I didn't follow the animation discussions very carefully at
> the time.
>
> [1] just below
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-smil-animation-20010904/#comma-wspBNF

Ok, this helps.
I did not see this before, then of course, simply the viewers and the
SVG testsuite samples are wrong already for SVG1.1 ...

Received on Wednesday, 27 August 2008 12:56:57 UTC