W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-smil@w3.org > April to June 2007

Re: frozen value for discrete animation

From: Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 19:07:37 +0200
To: www-smil@w3.org
Message-Id: <200704061907.37442.Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>


I see, for multiples I learned the same as it is mentioned in

6 = 1.2*5 is not a multiple of 5, because 1.2 = 6/5 is no integer.

Multiple is always the result of a multiplication with an integer, 
and 6 = 1.2*5 is an integer multiple of 1.2, because 6/1.2 = 5 
and 6, the result of multiplication, is an (even!) integer again, 
therefore 6 can be called an even integer multiple of 1.2 too...

This 'even' wording looks very plurivalent to me, 
not very useful for an (international) recommendation...

The given formular is already a good improvement compared
to the 'SMIL Animation Recommendation 04-September-2001',
I really like this, but the 'even' wording may still confuse several 
people (as I learned already in a related discussion about frozen 
animation related to these emails about frozen discrete
animations). There is a similar wording in the time interval
model section too, still without formular and therefore even (!)
more confusing concerning this discrete problem.

Olaf Hoffmann

> By even multiple we intended that it was an integer multiple, with no
> fractional or partial multiple result.  We should probably have said
> "integer multiple". To be really precise we would have to specify an
> (integer>0) multiple.
> Our intent with "some" positive integer is "any". This is an English
> expression, common in mathematical descriptions. Sorry for any confusion.
> Patrick
Received on Friday, 6 April 2007 17:15:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:34:26 UTC