W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > January 2005

Re: same-syntax extensions to RDF

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 09:59:52 +0000
Message-Id: <>
To: www-rdf-logic@w3.org

I am inclined to agree with those who see RDF's role as representing just 
instance data.  I've previously played with encoding some other things in 
RDF (without semantic rigor), and at the end of the day have found myself 
retreating to non-RDF encodings for reasons of pure pragmatism.


Graham Klyne
For email:
Received on Tuesday, 4 January 2005 10:32:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 11:10:43 UTC