W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > January 2005

RE: same-syntax extensions to RDF

From: Peter Crowther <Peter.Crowther@melandra.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 18:05:33 -0000
Message-ID: <DDBBD1E00935D144AB9563D57EF98D621D63C6@raccoon.melandra.net>
To: "Peter Crowther" <Peter.Crowther@melandra.com>
Cc: <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>

Just to set the record straight...

> From: Peter Crowther 
[...]
> I find it *possible* to work with RDF *data*.  It is certainly not
> 'nice' in even the Enid Blyton sense - I find it none of 'Pleasing and
> agreeable in nature', 'Showing or requiring great precision 
> or sensitive discernment; subtle'

My apologies, I skimmed that definition.  You're right - RDF data *is*
nice to work with, as it 'requir[es] great precision [and] sensitive
discernment' - otherwise you dig yourself into a hole.

		- Peter
Received on Saturday, 1 January 2005 18:05:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 11:10:43 UTC