Re: Syntax Question from Stephen Rhoads on 2004-12-17 (www-rdf-logic@w3.org from December 2004)

From: Stephen Rhoads <rhoadsnyc@mac.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 19:02:07 -0500
To: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
Message-ID: <10236639.1103241727080.JavaMail.rhoadsnyc@mac.com>

Noone dares to speculate about what the QCC syntax might one day look like?

>
>Folks,
>
>If Qualified Cardinality Constraints were part of OWL, what would they look like in the Abstract Syntax?  Something like this, maybe?
>
>class(Human partial
>   restriction(hasParent cardinality(2) Human))
>
>(Don't ask).
>
>--- Stephen
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 17 December 2004 00:02:09 UTC