W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > December 2004

Re: Syntax Question

From: Stephen Rhoads <rhoadsnyc@mac.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 19:02:07 -0500
Message-ID: <10236639.1103241727080.JavaMail.rhoadsnyc@mac.com>
To: www-rdf-logic@w3.org

Noone dares to speculate about what the QCC syntax might one day look like?

>
>Folks,
>
>If Qualified Cardinality Constraints were part of OWL, what would they look like in the Abstract Syntax?  Something like this, maybe?
>
>class(Human partial
>   restriction(hasParent cardinality(2) Human))
>
>(Don't ask).
>
>--- Stephen
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 17 December 2004 00:02:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:35:03 GMT