Noone dares to speculate about what the QCC syntax might one day look like? > >Folks, > >If Qualified Cardinality Constraints were part of OWL, what would they look like in the Abstract Syntax? Something like this, maybe? > >class(Human partial > restriction(hasParent cardinality(2) Human)) > >(Don't ask). > >--- Stephen > > >Received on Friday, 17 December 2004 00:02:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:35:03 GMT