W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > December 2004

Syntax Question

From: Stephen Rhoads <rhoadsnyc@mac.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 16:30:32 -0500
Message-ID: <16481316.1102023032513.JavaMail.rhoadsnyc@mac.com>
To: www-rdf-logic@w3.org

Folks,

If Qualified Cardinality Constraints were part of OWL, what would they look like in the Abstract Syntax?  Something like this, maybe?

class(Human partial
   restriction(hasParent cardinality(2) Human))

(Don't ask).

--- Stephen
Received on Thursday, 2 December 2004 21:30:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:35:03 GMT