W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > May 2003

Re: basicmkr.owl

From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 13:59:06 -0400
Message-ID: <095201c31d67$30320f90$b6f5d3ce@L565>
To: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@cdepot.net>, "www-rdf-logic at W3C" <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>

This may validate but it does not mean what I think you intend it to, for
example:

1) the object of an property given as the value of an _attribute_ is always
a literal string... in most cases I believe you intend these to be URIrefs
which should be indicated as

...
<foo:prop rdf:resource="#foo" />

rather than
<foo:bar foo:prop="foo" />

2) OWL has no concept of "mkr:similarTo" so although you can write this down
in OWL, OWL conformant software wouldn't have a clue as wether this is at
all 'similar' to "owl:sameAs" -- so I presume you are suggesting that MKR is
some type of extension to OWL Full? Which is fine ... I presume you have
software that can suck in some OWL ontologies as well as MKR statements and
do something interesting?

Jonathan

----- Original Message -----
From: Richard H. McCullough
To: Richard H. McCullough ; www-rdf-logic at W3C
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2003 7:30 PM
Subject: Re: basicmkr.owl


After several iterations, this version
http://rhm.cdepot.net/knowledge/theory/OWL/basicmkr.owl
passed the RDF Validator.

Dick McCullough
knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
knowledge haspart proposition list;
Received on Sunday, 18 May 2003 13:59:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:46 GMT