W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > March 2003

Using OWL to define itself?

From: Roger L. Costello <costello@mitre.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 07:59:46 -0500
Message-ID: <3E6C8C42.BED3F85B@mitre.org>
To: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
CC: "Costello,Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>

Hi Folks,

In the OWL Reference, Appendix B is a definition of OWL using RDF
Schemas (actually, it also uses OWL features, so it is not strictly
using RDF Schemas).  I believe that this document should be considered a
definition of OWL Full, correct?

Is there a similar document for OWL DL, and for OWL Lite?  That would be
very useful, especially for identifying the differences between Full,
DL, and Lite.  /Roger
Received on Monday, 10 March 2003 08:00:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:43 GMT