W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > March 2003

Re: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 10:03:18 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20030305.100318.76223374.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: connolly@w3.org
Cc: www-rdf-logic@w3.org

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
Date: 05 Mar 2003 09:50:50 -0500

[...]

> > In OWL Full, there is no need for the division of properties into
> > individual-valued and data-valued.  In OWL Full, stating that property is an
> > owl:ObjectProperty doesn't place any restrictions on the property,
> 
> Really? I guess I need to study this layering stuff more closely.

This is somewhat of a new feature, driven by one of the recent changes to
the RDF model theory (namely making LV part of IR).

> Is your presentation tomorrow likely to elucidate details like this?
> 
> "3:30 - 15:30 First afternoon session
>     Semantic Layering. presentation by Peter F. Patel-Schneider, Pat
> Hayes"
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/meetings/tech-200303/#L1130

No.  Tomorrow is for philosophy.  :-)

> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

peter
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2003 10:03:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:43 GMT