W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > April 2002

Re: rdf inclusion

From: Mike Dean <mdean@bbn.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 22:16:35 -0400
Message-Id: <200204230216.WAA19161@cam-mbx1.bbn.com>
To: Dave Rager <drager@bbn.com>
cc: Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>, Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>, www-rdf-logic@w3.org
I've been avoiding the use of daml:imports and not
encouraging others to use it, because the current DAML+OIL
specification makes no distinction between statements that
are imported and those that are not and daml:imports thus
seems to add gratuitous complexity.

I'm also concerned about the granularity of daml:imports.

This was discussed by WebOnt without resolution, but I can't
find it on the current issues list [1].


[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html
Received on Monday, 22 April 2002 22:18:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 11:10:37 UTC