From: Thomas B. Passin [mailto:tpassin@home.com] > Well, the assertion is a triple so once you reify it you can > association information with it by making assertions about the > reified statement. Isn't > that precisely what reification is for? Yes, that's what I had previously assumed, but if a reified statement is still a statement then it contradicts this claim from Peter Patel-Schneider : >> (In RDF terms >> this would probably be using a statement as the >> subject of another >> statement, which can't be done in RDF.) which he re-inforced with the following: >> This can't be done in DAML+OIL >> because assertions cannot have associated information. Hence my confusion. Cheers, IanReceived on Wednesday, 24 October 2001 04:59:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:41 GMT