Re: What do the ontologists want

[...]
> OK, though I see the Semantic Web as being *built* out of interacting
> ontologies, rather than being a way to get them made. There will be a
> lot of barrier-reef construction, of course, once it gets started.

This is coming from our yesterday's RDFCore telecon
-- http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfcore/2001-05-18.html

10:25:58 <em>  danbri: "what do the ontologists want" thread
10:26:19 <em>  danbri: asks jos to summarise the fact that the
                  issue hasn't been addressed
10:26:30 <em>  frankm: what would the logicians like to see in rdf
                  eg clarification of semantics, removing the cruft, etc.

Well, that was yesterday, and then I saw you saying
  [[the Semantic Web *built* out of interacting ontologies
    rather than a way to get them made]]
Now that goal must have some subgoals, I suppose, which could
then be further *resolved* with more subgoals, isn't it?

--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/