W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > May 2001

RE: What do the ontologists want

From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 07:59:11 -0400
To: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>, "pat hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Cc: "dehora" <bill@dehora.fsnet.co.uk>, <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001701c0df91$f3783fd0$0201a8c0@ne.mediaone.net>

  
> 
> So: can we try to avoid using the word "reification" unless we're
> saying what we're considering reifying?   Does that solve the problem?
> 
amen sandro.

hence the term 'quote' if it is not also similarly overloaded.

-Jonathan

Received on Friday, 18 May 2001 07:59:59 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jonathan Borden: "RE: What do the ontologists want"
Previous message: Jonathan Borden: "Surface vs. Abstract Syntax, was: RE: What do the ontologists want"
In reply to: Sandro Hawke: "Re: What do the ontologists want"
Next in thread: pat hayes: "Re: What do the ontologists want"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:39 GMT