RE: RDF core: abstract syntax and semantics - an attempt

Hey - good work. There are at least two other attempts to do the same that
have been by this list, but neither promoted the reification (or is it
quoting) as a hook - some more non-normative but informative words would be
appreciated.

---
Danny Ayers
http://www.isacat.net

>-----Original Message-----
>From: www-rdf-logic-request@w3.org
>[mailto:www-rdf-logic-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Graham Klyne
>Sent: 21 June 2001 17:19
>To: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
>Subject: RDF core: abstract syntax and semantics - an attempt
>
>
>Folks,
>
>Please find attached, for your contemplation, an attempt at defining an
>abstract syntax AND semantics for an RDF "core" consisting of just ground
>facts and reifications.
>
>I'm not experienced at this kind of thing, but already I think I can see
>how "reification" can be used as a hook for additional semantics.  But,
>before running, I should see if I can really walk...
>
>#g
>
>
>------------
>Graham Klyne
>(GK@ACM.ORG)
>