W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > June 2001

Re: RDF Statements as floating Cons Cells

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 12:27:53 -0400 (EDT)
To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
cc: Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>, <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106081223410.12225-100000@tux.w3.org>

On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, pat hayes wrote:
> Maybe we should stick to using RDF as a simple ground-data language,
> and just build or use something else altogether for doing more
> complicated stuff.

Shove in a version number ("RDF 1.0") and that's pretty much my view. For
simple ground-data, the node'n'arc stuff's really handy, but it is painful
to watch the contortions people have to go through when they decide to
represent everything and anything as RDF 1.0 triples.

> Pat

Received on Friday, 8 June 2001 12:27:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 11:10:35 UTC